View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Theory of Constraints | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Operations Process Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h Analyse, laufend | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow Metrics | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ProcessOperationsImprovement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






