View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Theory of Change |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 60-120 min | Wochen bis Monate je Goal |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Theory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome Measures | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports |
Tagsno overlap | ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
