View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Change | ![]() Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud | ![]() Product Strategy GIST Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Theory of Change translates a desired impact into a traceable chain of change. It makes assumptions, intermediate goals, and measurement points visible before a program is rolled out at scale. | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 60-120 min | Wochen bis Monate je Goal |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Theory of Change Map, Assumptions, Outcome Measures | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports |
Tagsno overlap | ImpactOutcomesSystems thinkingStrategy | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






