View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






