View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-10 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tags1 shared | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
