View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Teach-back | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Decision Making Argument Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-3 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | SensemakingDecisionRationale |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






