View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile T-Shirt Sizing |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-15 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | ROAM Board, Owner List | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRoadmap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
