View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile T-Shirt Sizing |  Operations Process Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-10 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRoadmap | ProcessOperationsImprovement | EstimationEffortRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
