View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile T-Shirt Sizing | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Agile Story Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 15-60 min | laufend, 1-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 2-9 | 3-9 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data |
Tags2 shared | EstimationAgileRoadmap | EstimationEffortAgile | EstimationAgileMeasurement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






