View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() Innovation Design Thinking | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | 4-10 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | QuantitativeResearchValidation | InnovationPrototypeResearch | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






