View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews | 45-90 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-10 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
