View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Storytelling |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Facilitation Six Thinking Hats |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-120 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items |
Tags1 shared | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | FacilitationOptionsDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
