View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Storyboarding |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a usage scenario needs to become understandable early, it condenses situations, context, and flow into a legible sequence. It helps check concept ideas before anything gets built. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | Based on research question | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Storyboard, Concept Narrative, Testable Assumptions | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | VisualizationConceptsSequencePrototype | Information architectureNavigationFindability | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
