View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Storyboarding | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Innovation Design Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a usage scenario needs to become understandable early, it condenses situations, context, and flow into a legible sequence. It helps check concept ideas before anything gets built. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 15-45 min | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1-3 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Storyboard, Concept Narrative, Testable Assumptions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | VisualizationConceptsSequencePrototype | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | InnovationPrototypeResearch |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






