View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Points |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 4-12 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileMeasurement | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
