View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 1-2 h | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
