View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 0.5-2 Tage | Wochen bis Monate je Goal |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
