View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min je Interview | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 5-12 Interviews | 1-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






