methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview1-4 Wochen20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
5-10 Interviews3-10 KundenBased on research question
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration for Wizard of Oz Test
Product Discovery
Wizard of Oz Test
A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint
Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas