View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Six Thinking Hats | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 6-12 | 2-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationOptionsDecision | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






