View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile ROAM Board |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 5-12 Interviews | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
