View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 5-12 Interviews | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






