View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() UX Research Surveys |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 4-5 Tage | 3-14 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 5-8 | 50+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | QuantitativeResearchValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






