View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 15-45 min | 30–60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 4-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
