View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Decision Making Red Teaming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-20 Reviewer | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan |
Tags1 shared | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | RiskDecisionSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
