View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30–60 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-8 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
