View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile Specification by Example |  Decision Making DACI |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-6 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
