View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Engineering Golden Path | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When teams need a reliable default path for frequent use, sprawl quickly emerges without any guiding logic. Golden Path bundles the preferred path so good practice becomes easy and deviation becomes deliberate. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-3 Tage Setup, laufend | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Golden Path Guide, Templates, Quality Checks | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | EngineeringProductivityGovernance | RiskRoot causeSafety |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






