View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Facilitation Storytelling |  Delivery Shape Up |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-120 min | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1-6 | 2-4 pro Pitch |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
