View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Storytelling |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-90 min | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-6 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
