View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Radar | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-3 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






