View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | LeanObservationProcessOperations | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
