View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 90-180 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-8 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
