View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  UX Research Diary Study |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-3 Wochen | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 5-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | UX researchObservationContext | UX researchTrackingBehavior |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
