View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-3 h | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | SensemakingDecisionRationale | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
