View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Product Canvas |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When product goal and feature scope don't yet fit cleanly together, it creates a shared working picture. It connects need, core features, and assumptions into a solid starting point. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 15-45 min | 2-8 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-3 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Canvas, Product Assumptions, Scope Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasDiscoveryScope | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
