View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Product Canvas |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Operations 8D Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When product goal and feature scope don't yet fit cleanly together, it creates a shared working picture. It connects need, core features, and assumptions into a solid starting point. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 15-45 min | 1-6 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-3 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Canvas, Product Assumptions, Scope Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasDiscoveryScope | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
