View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.





