View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping | ![]() Operations Fishbone Diagram | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 30-60 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationDemandMVP | Root causeQualityOperations | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






