View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Planning Poker |  Agile Ideal Days |  Decision Making Wideband Delphi |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | 15-60 min | 1-4 h or multiple rounds |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 2-9 | 4-12 Experten |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus Notes |
Tags1 shared | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | EstimationEffortAgile | EstimationExpertsForecasting |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
