View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Personas |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 30–60 min per interview | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 1 participant per interview | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
