View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Personas | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 1-3 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 5-30 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






