View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Option Framing |  Architecture SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) |  Business Strategy McKinsey 7S |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | SAAM helps teams judge an architecture’s suitability for selected tasks and changes. It is particularly useful for examining modifiability and comparing architecture alternatives with clear reasoning. | McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-120 min | Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Domain functions mapped to components and connections, Quality attributes and evaluation criteria, Typical tasks and their effects on the architecture, Reasoned evaluation or comparison of alternatives | 7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions |
Tagsno overlap | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | ArchitectureChangeAnalysisComparisonQuality | OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
