View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 45–75 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | Team members involved | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LearningDialogueFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






