View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy OKRs | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h Setup | 90-180 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-20 | 4-12 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tags1 shared | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






