View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Nominal Group Technique | ![]() Facilitation World Café | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-180 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 12-100+ | 20-500+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






