View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Decision Making Force Field Analysis | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 45-90 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-12 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | ChangeDecisionStrategy | LearningDialogueFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






