View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas | ![]() UX Research Card Sorting | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 20-45 min | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | Based on research question | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | Information architectureNavigationStructure | LeanObservationProcessOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






