View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Kano Model | ![]() Facilitation Timeline | ![]() Decision Making Decision Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-12 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Timeline, Milestones, Insight Notes | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | TimelineFacilitationSequence | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






