methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration of Shape Up with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Shape Up
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts.
Complexitysame
MediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down
Participantsdifferent
10-502-4 pro Pitch
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesPitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes
Tagsno overlap
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
PlanningDeliveryAutonomy
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Communication Plan
Delivery
Communication Plan
Paper illustration of Cost of Delay with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Cost of Delay
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method